Showing posts with label constitution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label constitution. Show all posts

Sunday, February 20, 2011

The Federal Territory of Pennsylvania and the Articles of Confederation




In the case of an insurrection or coup attempt in Washington, D.C., Pennsylvania and the other original 13 Colonies automatically reverts to the Articles of Confederation, and to Federal Territories, with a government analogous to the Federal Territory of Nebraska, circa 1878. Since Presidents Clinton, Bush, and Obama are really moslem Soviet/Cuban spies, Pennsylvania has reverted to the Federal Territory of Pennsylvania under the Articles of Confederation of 1781. Additonally, the American Federal Government holds of the Pennsylvania Charter 0f 1681, since the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation were drafted and signed in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Thus, where Constitutional law as found in the Pennsylvania Constitution of the American Constitution is being ignored, Pennsylvania reverts to the Federal Territory of Pennsylvania, as bound by the Law of Reason and the English Common Law of 1681, House of Stuart, Episcopalian Catholic Church, as required by the Pennsylvania Charter of 1681. Thus, Law in Pennsylvania is primarily Sheriff's Law, or the Law of Logic, which requires both individual persons, corporations, and governmental actors to act in accordance with the Law of Logic, that is, they cannot commit the common law crime or civil offense of Sophistry. Sophistry is the act of using a statement, argument, or assertion which involves a logical contradiction. Additionally, any Pennsylvania Citizen can step up as a Militia Captain, and thus as a Pennsyvania Federal Territorial Marshall. Law enforcement in Pennsylvania, then, is primarily done througth Sheriff's Law as enforced by Pennsylvania Federal Territorial Marshalls. In this way, Pennsyvlvania can essentially cede from the Union by reverting to a Federal Territory. Thus, there can be no charge of treason against Pennsylvanians for being Federal Territorial Citizens. In the case of an insurrection or coup attempt in Washington with the Federal Government which is "legitimated" by the United States Constitution of 1789, there really is no other rational choice. Pennsylvania can revert to the Federal Territory of Pennsylvania and the Articles of Confederation by an enacted Resolution by the Pennsylvania Legislature as signed by the Govenor and approved by the Pennsylvania Attorney General.

(C)Perpetual Copyright by Anthony J. Faber and Neothomism, P.C. (PA)

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Enforcing Sheriff's Law in a Criminal Proceeding


Misprison of Felony is charged against a public official such as a judge, police officer, prosecutor, or prison warden, when a criminal defendant is conclusively presumed guilty in an inquisitorial fashion such as where a police officer or warden just throws a person into jail without a trial which meets the requirements of a reasonable proceeding based upon substantive and procedural due process. The prisoner-criminal defendant charges the judge or prison warden, for example, with the crime of Misprison of Felony for violating Sheriff's Law, that is, the Law of Logic. You see, when the judge or prison warden essentially finds the person guility qua guilty, or guilty on the basis of some authority of the judge, then, in either instance it is clear that the judge has violated Sheriff's Law by violating the Law of Logic by committing the illegal sophistry of using a tautological argument (guilty because guilty) or an illegal appeal to authority (You are guilty because I say so).

Additionally, Treason on the Assizes is charged against the govenor, or judge, or prosecutor, or police officer, for violating Sheriff's Law in reference to neighboring counties or states as counties for criminally violating Sheriff's Law, that is, the Law of Logic. Violating Sheriff's Law or the Law of Logic is analogous to committing the crime of Constitutional Treason (Lipkin). Under Sheriff's Law, that is, the Law of Logic, a person or governmental official is not allowed to interfere with a person's liberty interest by reason of acts which are based upon sophistry or which are unreasonable.